Back to articles
Bacteriology11 min read

TPHA Test: Principle, Procedure, Results, and Interpretation for Syphilis Confirmation

TPHA (Treponema pallidum Haemagglutination Assay) is the standard treponemal confirmatory test for syphilis. Learn its passive haemagglutination principle, microtiter procedure, reactive vs non-reactive results, false positives, and when to use TPHA vs FTA-ABS.

A 28-year-old man presents to a sexual health clinic after a routine screening reveals a reactive RPR at a titer of 1:8. He has no symptoms — no rash, no genital ulcer, nothing clinically apparent. He is alarmed. His clinician explains that the RPR is a screening test that can be falsely positive in several conditions including recent viral infections, autoimmune diseases, and certain chronic illnesses.

Before treatment is considered, a confirmatory treponemal test is needed. This is where TPHA comes in. Unlike the RPR — which measures antibodies to cardiolipin, a lipid found in many tissues — the TPHA specifically detects antibodies against Treponema pallidum, the causative organism of syphilis. If the TPHA is reactive, syphilis infection (past or present) is confirmed. If non-reactive, the RPR result is most likely a biological false positive.

The TPHA is the most widely used treponemal confirmatory test globally, preferred over the FTA-ABS in routine clinical settings because it requires no fluorescence microscope, produces objective readable results, and is available from multiple commercial manufacturers at accessible cost.

Treponema pallidum Hemagglutination Assay (TPHA) is a treponemal test for the serologic diagnosis of syphilis, a sexually transmitted infection caused by spirochetes, Treponema pallidum. Based on the principle of passive haemagglutination, this test detects anti-treponemal antibodies (IgG and IgM antibodies) in serum or CSF. TPHA  has been used as a confirmatory test for the diagnosis of Treponema pallidum infection since the mid-1960s. TPHA is a good primary screening test for syphilis at all stages beyond the early primary stage.

TPHA in the Syphilis Serology Framework

Understanding where TPHA fits in syphilis diagnosis requires knowing the full test landscape:

Test Type Detects Reactive in past treated infection? Main use
RPR / VDRL Non-treponemal Anti-cardiolipin (reagin) antibodies No (usually reverts after treatment) Screening + treatment monitoring
TPHA / TPPA Treponemal Anti-T. pallidum antibodies (IgG + IgM) Yes — for life Confirmatory test; most widely used
FTA-ABS Treponemal Anti-T. pallidum antibodies (IgG + IgM) Yes — for life Confirmatory; more sensitive in early primary

TPHA's specific role:

  • Confirms a reactive non-treponemal result (RPR or VDRL)
  • Distinguishes true syphilis from biological false-positive non-treponemal tests
  • Used in epidemiological surveys for syphilis prevalence
  • Cannot be used to monitor treatment response (remains reactive for life)
  • Less sensitive than FTA-ABS in very early primary syphilis (window period)

The important limitation to state explicitly: TPHA will remain reactive for life in a person who was successfully treated for syphilis years ago. A reactive TPHA in someone with a low or non-reactive RPR most likely represents past treated infection, not active disease requiring treatment.

Principle

TPHA test is a passive hemagglutination assay based on hemagglutination of erythrocytes sensitized with T. pallidum antigen by antibodies found in the patient’s serum or plasma.  It is used for both qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of anti-treponemal antibodies.

TPHA Test Principle - TPHA Test PrincipleFigure: TPHA Test Principle

The test sample is diluted in absorbing diluent to remove possible cross-reacting heterophile antibody and to remove, block, or absorb potentially cross-reacting, nonpathogenic treponemal antibodies. Sera containing antibodies to T. pallidum react with erythrocytes (chicken or avian) sensitized with sonicated T. pallidum, Nichols strain (the antigen), to form a smooth mat of agglutinated cells in the microtiter tray well. If antibodies are not present the cells settle to the bottom of the tray well, forming a compact button of unagglutinated cells.

Sensitivity of TPHA by Stage of Syphilis

Stage TPHA sensitivity Clinical note
Primary (very early, <3 weeks) ~65–76% Window period — TPHA may be negative in early primary syphilis; FTA-ABS becomes positive earlier
Primary (established chancre) ~76–84% Use FTA-ABS if TPHA is negative but primary syphilis is clinically suspected
Secondary ~100% All treponemal tests reactive
Latent (early and late) ~97–99% Highly sensitive; reliable for latent disease screening
Late/tertiary ~99% Very sensitive at this stage even when RPR may be low

The early primary gap: TPHA is less sensitive than FTA-ABS in the first 3–4 weeks of primary infection. In a patient with a suspicious genital ulcer and a non-reactive TPHA, FTA-ABS should be requested to avoid missing early primary syphilis. Darkfield microscopy of the chancre (where available) is the most sensitive test in this window.

Uses of TPHA

  1. Confirmatory testing after reactive non-treponemal screen: The primary use — confirming that a reactive RPR or VDRL represents true treponemal infection rather than a biological false positive.
  2. Epidemiological syphilis surveillance: Population-level syphilis prevalence surveys use TPHA because it is objective, reproducible, and can be performed on stored sera without the reader-dependent variation of fluorescence microscopy (FTA-ABS).
  3. Blood bank screening: Some blood transfusion services use TPHA alongside or instead of non-treponemal tests for donor screening.
  4. Antenatal screening panel: In settings with higher syphilis prevalence, a combined screen (RPR + TPHA) improves both sensitivity and specificity compared to single-test screening.
  5. Semi-quantitative titer for baseline: TPHA can be performed quantitatively (serial doubling dilutions), providing a baseline treponemal antibody titer, though this is less clinically useful than RPR titers for monitoring because treponemal titers do not fall predictably with treatment.

Reagents (supplied by manufacturers)

  1. Test cell suspensions: Preserved  RBCs treated with tannic acid and coated with T. pallidum antigen.
  2. Control cell suspension: Preserved RBCs (without immobilized T. pallidum antigen)
  3. Buffer: Phosphate buffered saline solution containing adsorbers (used to remove possible cross-reacting heterophile antibodies).
  4. Positive Control serum: Human serum containing antibodies against T. pallidum. Ready for use. This will give an equivalent titer of 1/640 to 1/2560 with the quantitative test.
  5. Negative Control serum: Human serum free of antibodies against T. pallidum

Procedure

Before performing the test procedure, bring the sample, diluent, control, and test cells at room temperature (25 – 30ºC). For each qualitative test, a test card with three wells is needed.

A:Dilution of serum sample

  1. Add 10μL of patient’s serum in the first well (say well A).
  2. Add 190 μL of diluent (provided by the manufacturer).
  3. Mix the content well using a micropipette; we will use this diluted serum later.

B: Testing of serum sample for the presence of specific antibodies

  1. Add 75μL of “control cells” to well B and 75 μL of “test cells” to well C.
  2. Add 25μL of diluted serum on each B and C well.
  3. Shake the plate gently to mix the contents thoroughly.
  4. Cover the plate and protect to direct sunlight, heat and any source of vibration.
  5. Incubate 45-60 minutes at room temperature.
  6. Read the test results and interpret.

Positive control and negative control should be run along with the test serum (see quality control section below).

Results and Interpretation

If the controls (positive control and negative control) do not give the expected result, all assays performed in that batch are invalid and must be tested again.

Results Test Cells Control Cells
Strongly Reactive Full cell pattern covering the bottom of the well. No agglutination tight button
Weakly Reactive Cell pattern covers approx. 1/3 of well bottom No agglutination tight button
Indeterminate (Equivocal) Cell pattern shows a distinctly open centre No agglutination tight button
Nonreactive Cells settled to a compact bottom, typically with a small clear center. No agglutination tight button
  1. Reactive (R): Reactive results may indicate an active, past, or successfully treated infection. A diagnosis should be made with a careful history of the patient and a physical examination as well as pertinent laboratory results.
  2. Indeterminate: indeterminate results are confirmed with the MHATP and FTA-ABS test tests.
  3. False Positive results: Although TPHA test is highly specific, false-positive results have been known to occur in patients suffering from leprosy, infectious mononucleosis, and connective tissue disorders. For confirmation, FTA-ABS test should be used.

Distinguishing true positive from false positive TPHA: A reactive TPHA in the context of clinical signs or symptoms of syphilis, or alongside a reactive RPR, strongly suggests true infection. A reactive TPHA with a non-reactive RPR in an asymptomatic patient most likely represents either: (1) past successfully treated syphilis (the most common scenario in practice), or (2) a rare false-positive TPHA in one of the conditions listed above. Clinical history is essential: document any previous syphilis treatment, review old records, and consider whether the patient has lived in or travelled to areas where non-venereal treponematoses (yaws, bejel, pinta) are endemic — these will also give reactive TPHA results indistinguishable from venereal syphilis.

Quality Control

Positive and negative control are included in the test kit  for the quality control. Control should be recommended in the following cases:

  • At least once a run
  • At least once within 24 hours
  • When changing vial of reagent.

If the control is not showing expected results; the test is invalid (whatever be the test results).

Similar Tests

  1. Treponema pallidum Particle Assay (TP-PA) is another treponemal test. It uses gelatin particles as carrier molecules. Some studies have reported that TPPA has higher sensitivity than the TPHA in detecting cases of primary stage syphilis.
  2. Microhemagglutination Assay for Treponema pallidum (MHA-TP): It is another confirmatory test to detect treponemal antibodies. This test is used much less commonly now.
  3. Treponema pallidum immobilization (TPI) test This test measures the presence of antibodies against Treponema pallidum in the patient’s serum.T. pallidum (Nichols strain) grown in rabbit testes is used as the antigen. If the patient’s serum contains antibodies against treponema, antibody and complement immobilizes the living treponemes. The test results are read by dark-field microscopy. Failure to immobilize the treponema strain suggests the absence of antibody in the patient’s serum, thus not infected with syphilis. TPI test is technically difficult, expensive, time-consuming so rarely performed nowadays.

How to Remember

TPHA = T. pallidum-coated red cells that clump when antibody is present.

The test is conceptually simple: red blood cells are coated with T. pallidum antigen. If the patient has anti-treponemal antibodies, those antibodies bridge adjacent red cells, causing them to agglutinate into a mat covering the well floor. No antibody = cells settle into a tight button at the centre of the well. The pattern is read visually — no microscope needed, which is the key practical advantage over FTA-ABS.

The passive haemagglutination principle: Unlike direct haemagglutination (where the organism itself agglutinates red cells), TPHA is passive — the red cells are just carriers of the treponemal antigen. The antibody bridges the antigen-coated cells together. The word "passive" is the clue: the cells are passive carriers, not the active participants in the reaction.

The two confirmatory test decision:

  • TPHA first: standard routine choice; no fluorescence microscope; objective result
  • FTA-ABS if TPHA is negative but primary syphilis is still suspected: more sensitive in the early primary window (3–4 weeks post-infection)

Reading the well:

  • Mat pattern (cells cover the whole well floor) = reactive — think "spreading out = positive"
  • Button (cells in tight central cluster) = non-reactive — think "clumping together = negative"

This is counterintuitive — clumping sounds like a positive result, but in TPHA it is the non-reactive pattern. Remember: the mat (spread) is positive; the button (tight) is negative.

References

  1. Kashyap, B., Goyal, N., Gupta, N., Singh, N. P., & Kumar, V. (2018). Evaluation of Treponema pallidum Hemagglutination Assay among Varying Titers of the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory Test. Indian journal of dermatology, 63(6), 479–483. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_595_17
  2. Gupta, K., Bhardwaj, A., Dash, S., & Kaur, I. R. (2018). Role of Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay for diagnosis of syphilis in low titers of VDRL-reactive sera: A prospective study from a large tertiary care center of East Delhi. Journal of family medicine and primary care, 7(6), 1594–1595. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_258_18
  3. Larsen S.A., Steiner B.M., Rudolph A.H. (1995). Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 8(1), 1–21.
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021: Syphilis. MMWR, 70(4).
  5. Tille, P. M. (2017). Bailey and Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology (14th ed.). Elsevier.
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

How is the TPHA result read from the microtiter well and what distinguishes a mat pattern from a button pattern?

After incubation in the TPHA microtiter plate, the results are read by examining the sedimentation pattern of red blood cells at the bottom of each well. A reactive (positive) result produces a mat or shield pattern — the red blood cells have agglutinated and settled across the entire floor of the well in a diffuse, uniform layer. This happens because patient antibodies have bridged adjacent T. pallidum-sensitised red cells, causing them to clump together and spread across the well floor rather than settling into a compact pile. A non-reactive (negative) result produces a button pattern — the red blood cells have not agglutinated and settle by gravity into a tight, compact disc at the very centre of the conical or U-shaped well floor. The test should be read after 45–60 minutes of incubation at room temperature without disturbance. Partial agglutination (a ring pattern or incomplete mat) may indicate a low positive — interpret as weakly reactive and confirm with a quantitative dilution series. The test should be read under good overhead lighting with the plate held flat — do not tilt the plate, as this will displace the button and may cause a false-positive interpretation.

Can the TPHA test distinguish between different treponemal infections, such as syphilis versus yaws?

No — the TPHA cannot distinguish venereal syphilis (caused by T. pallidum subsp. pallidum) from non-venereal treponematoses including yaws (T. pallidum subsp. pertenue), bejel or endemic syphilis (T. pallidum subsp. endemicum), and pinta (T. carateum). All four organisms produce antigenically similar proteins that cross-react with the T. pallidum Nichols strain antigen used in TPHA test kits. A patient who acquired yaws in childhood in an endemic region (West Africa, Papua New Guinea, South America) will have a reactive TPHA that is serologically indistinguishable from venereal syphilis. The FTA-ABS test similarly cannot make this distinction. Clinical history — including geographic origin, childhood exposure in endemic areas, presence or history of characteristic skin lesions — is essential for distinguishing the treponematoses. This cross-reactivity is clinically important: a patient from a yaws-endemic region presenting with a reactive TPHA may not have venereal syphilis and may be unnecessarily treated for an STI when the reactive result reflects childhood yaws, which does not require the same treatment or contact tracing.

What does an isolated reactive TPHA with non-reactive RPR mean, and how should it be managed?

An isolated reactive TPHA with a non-reactive RPR represents one of the most common interpretive challenges in syphilis serology. The four possibilities in order of clinical likelihood are: (1) Past treated syphilis — the most common explanation; treponemal tests remain reactive for life after infection regardless of treatment, while RPR typically reverts to non-reactive after successful treatment; a careful history of previous syphilis diagnosis and treatment should be sought. (2) Late latent or late tertiary syphilis — RPR may be non-reactive or at very low titer in late stages while treponemal tests remain positive; if no treatment history is documented, this patient requires further evaluation including examination and possibly lumbar puncture. (3) Occult HBV equivalent — in syphilis, low-level treponemal infection is possible where enough antigen is present to stimulate antibody production detectable by TPHA but not enough replicating organisms to trigger reagin antibody production detectable by RPR; this is uncommon. (4) False-positive TPHA — occurs in leprosy, malaria, infectious mononucleosis, and connective tissue disease. Management: review the clinical history thoroughly; if no previous syphilis treatment is documented, treat as late latent syphilis regardless of RPR status, as untreated late syphilis can cause serious cardiovascular and neurological complications.
Acharya Tankeshwar
About Author
Acharya Tankeshwar

Tankeshwar Acharya, MSc (Medical Microbiology)

Tankeshwar Acharya is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Microbiology at Patan Academy of Health Sciences (PAHS), Nepal, where he has been teaching and practicing clinical microbiology for over 14 years. He is the founder of Microbe Online, one of the leading free microbiology education resources on the web, covering bacteriology, mycology, parasitology, immunology, and clinical laboratory diagnostics written from direct experience in both the classroom and the diagnostic laboratory.